Kripke's (Alleged) Argument for the Necessity of Identity Statements
I have often encountered in articles, talks and classes the following argument for the necessity of true identity statements, always attributed to Kripke:
1) a = b (assumption)
2)a = a
3)a = b (from 1, 2 by Leibniz' Law)
The argument is no good, and I think it is very doubtful that Kripke ever endorsed it.